“Operacion Libertad” inledd i Venezuela

Sedan idag hungerstrejkar ett antal ungdomar i organisationen JAVU utanför OAS byggnad i Venezuelas huvudstad Caracas. Deras krav är att regimen under Hugo Chávez skall släppa alla landets politiska fångar fria, inklusive domare Maria Afiuni, och fd presidentkandidat Alejandro Peña Esclusa. JAVU står för Juventud Activa Venezuela Unida (Aktiv Ungdom Enat Venezuela). Aktionen kallar de för Operación Libertad, Operation Frihet. Twitter tag är #OperacionLibertad.

Hungerstrejkande ungdomar
Hungerstrejken utanför Organisationen för Amerikanska Stater i Caracas, Venezuela, syftar till att få OAS att ta tag i frågan om övergrepp mot mänskliga rättigheter i landet.

Tidpunkten verkar vald för att kasta smolk i glädjebägaren för Hugo Chávez, då den 2 februari var planerat som en dag att fira 12-årsdagen av då han svors in som demokratiskt vald president. Hans bristande respekt för grundläggande mänskliga rättigheter för hans politiska fiender, och hans åsidosättande av rättsväsende, riksdag, landsting, kommuner och grundlag, har dock fått honom att bli formellt definierad som diktator av uppåt ett hundratal organisationer både inom och utom landet. Valet av OAS (Organisationen för Amerikanska Stater) beror på att de har ett mandat att försvara demokrati i medlemsländerna, vilket de helt verkar strunta i då det gäller införande av diktatur “åt vänster”.

Political prisoners
De politiska fångarna i Venezuela. Från www.liberenlosya.com

Enligt en analys av USAs ambassad i Caracas (i ett wikileaks-läckt telegram) är Chávez mera intresserad av att hålla sig kvar vid makten, än av det socialistiska projekt han talar sig så varm för, “bolivariansk socialism”. Simón Bolívar var den ledare för den Sydamerikanska befrielserörelsen som till slut lyckades göra kontinenten fri från Spanien.

Trots att Chávez predikar socialism, och i snabb takt nationaliserar företag (över 700 hittills) och jordbruk (2,5 miljoner ha enligt The Guardian), så bryter han i aktiv handling mot sin egen ideologi då han säljer ut det av hans föregångare Carlos Andrés Pérez på 70-talet förstatligade oljebolaget PDVSA för att få in kapital. Den senaste affären som blivit känd var en försäljning av aktier för 1,6 miljarder dollar till Ryssland, i samband med en affär i vilken ett ryskt bananföretag ingick ett samarbete med ett venezolanskt statligt företag om att driva 20 tusen ha bananplantager i Venezuela.

I december försökte Chávez konfiskera 47 gårdar söder om Maracaibosjön, men några av dem lyckades hålla militären och myndigheterna stången. Motiveringen som anfördes för konfiskationen var att ge oanvänd mark för bostäder till de som blivit hemlösa i höstens översvämningar i området. Eftersom marken är översvämningsbenägen är den dock olämplig till ändamålet, och dessutom är den inte oanvänd; närapå hälften av landets mjölkproduktion kommer från de gårdarna. Den verkliga anledningen föreföll komma fram då kopplingen till banankontraktet blev känt. Det kan dock finnas ytterligare lager av lögner i historien.

Området ifråga har outnyttjade oljereserver, och just Ryssland har levererat avancerade stridsflygplan och tunga stridsvagnar till Chávez på kredit. Gårdarna ligger bara 10 mil från Colombia, där finns ett flygfält av 2,6 km längd, och det är stridsvagnsterräng. Sedan i julas har regionen gradvis militariserats, och förklarats vara ett nytt militärområde. Där finns nu 1,600 soldater som patrullerar vägarna på landsbygden, och det är ständiga identitetskontroller i huvudorten, Santa Barbara.

Hungerstrejkande ungdomar
Några av de hungerstrejkande ungdomarna som kräver att alla politiska fångar i Venezuela omedelbart släpps fria.

Fotnot: Det var just mot Carlos Andrés Pérez (CAP) som Chávez gjorde den misslyckade militärkuppen 1992, och Chávez betraktade CAP som hans kanske värsta fiende, tills denne dog på juldagen. Frågan om CAP skall begravas i Miami eller i Venezuela är nu föremål för ett domstolsavgörande i Miami; CAP själv lär ha sagt att han inte ville bli begraven i Venezuela så länge Chávez styr landet, utan först “då demokratin återetablerats”. En annan observation som kan göras är att Chávez inte är den första att predika socialism samtidigt som han privatiserar; Adolf Hitler gjorde också det.

Venezuelans Defend against Chávez’s Treason

A Russian base in Venezuela? They have delivered Suhkoi-30 advanced fighter jets, battle tanks T-72, and have signed a deal to establish a 200 km2 banana plantation south of Lake Maracaibo. In December the government under Hugo Chávez confiscated 47 farms of about that surface area around Santa Barbara. Sunday January 30 they are reportedly planning to confiscate houses and lots in Santa Barbara itself, perhaps to get housing for the Russians. The gendarmes (GN) are assisting with these confiscations. They call it expropriations, but they don’t pay compensation so it is really squatting, and there is no legal procedure involved. Just like Castro did on Cuba 50 years ago; in fact, Raúl Castro is to this day living as a squatter in a house that belongs to a friend of mine. All of this is of course blatant violations of the UN declaration of universal human rights. Many regular folks in Venezuela are determined to prevent this, to stand up to the military, and the live blog below is set up so they can post there tweets and photos in real time as events unfold. However, the real deal behind this is oil: In return for this banana contract the Russians got $1.6 billion worth of stocks in the Venezuela government-owned oil company PDVSA. Where are the oil reserves of Venezuela? Take a wild guess. Yes, much of it is around Lake Maracaibo.

Map
Santa Barbara is located SW of Lake Maracaibo, about 90 km from the border to Colombia. It has a 2600 m airfield.


(The times are 30 minutes before Venezuelan time, 1 hour before ET.)

Photos of military operations in the area 2011-01-27 http://plixi.com/p/72828075 http://plixi.com/p/72822750

Update: Some breaking news regarding the fire in the INTI offices in Santa Barbara. The confiscations tomorrow include property belonging to a man who was arrested accused of having set this fire, so this news is very relevant. At the night of the fire some farmers, chavistas, were drinking in the INTI office with the head of the office. The farmers were expecting to get part of the land that had been confiscated, that’s what Chavez had promised. But that evening they found out that the land would go to a banana deal with a Russian company, and so they got mad. They went out to block a road, but there was no traffic at that time of night so they returned, observed by quite a few persons. That’s when they put fire to the office. When the firemen arrived the head of the office held them back, dressed in only underwear, pistol in hand. When he finally allowed them to extinguish the fire, when all the documents had burned (except his address book), they found a woman locked up in the bathroom. Since then about a dozen persons have been arrested, who all have one thing in common: They are in opposition to Chavez. Wait, they have two things in common. Neither one was there that night.

Footnote about the oil reserves. Swedish “moderate” (i.e. right-wing) newspaper SvD writes that “Venezuela has the world’s largest oil reserve” but news that seeps out, pardon the pun, from Venezuela and Argentina suggests that there may be nothing more than politics behind those figures (“Do you remember the ‘mega-reservoir’ of oil that Enarsa found in Venezuela?”).

Bolivian Senators demand Peña Esclusa released

An influential group of Senators in La Paz, Bolivia, led by the Second Vice-President of the Senate January 21 sent a letter to Hugo Chávez and demanded the immediate release of the Venezuelan political leader, Alejandro Peña Esclusa.
 
In their letter, the Senate Officials claimed that “Peña Esclusa’s arrest and the judicial process against him was plagued with irregularities.” They add that “since 2002, Peña Esclusa has been the victim of systematic persecution and judicial attacks, led by the Venezuelan government.”
 
In their communication the Senators denounced that “the illegal imprisonment of Alejandro Peña-Esclusa is clearly intended to silence him and to prevent him from continuing his successful opposition activities, which have taken place within the democratic framework and the Venezuelan laws.”
 
The letter goes on to say that “it is no secret that since 1995, Peña Esclusa has been denouncing both verbally and in national and international courts the characteristics of the totalitarian regime of Hugo Chavez and his ties to the FARC narco-terrorist group. At the time of his arrest, Peña-Esclusa was leading an international team of lawyers whose goal was to accuse Chavez for crimes against humanity.”
 
Bolivian Senators accused the Bolivarian National Intelligence Service (SEBIN) of planting false evidence during the raid at the home of Peña-Esclusa to incriminate him illegally.
 
The Parliamentarians highlighted the career of the President of UnoAmerica: “Alejandro Peña Esclusa is internationally recognized for his extensive work on behalf of democracy, freedom and human rights, something which has earned him accolades, awards, and appointments to Senior positions in various organizations. He is a prominent intellectual who has written thousands of articles and 6 books, some of which have been translated into other languages.”
 
The letter ends by saying “we will remain alert and vigilant against this flagrant violation of human rights and freedom, and will not rest until we see Peña Esclusa free, so that he can continue contributing to the advancement of democracy and regional development.”

The list of signatories is headed by the Second Vice President (Speaker) of the Senate, Carmen Eva Gonzalez Lafuente, and the Head of the National Convergence Caucus, German Antelo Vaca. Also signed Senators Centa Reck, Jeanine Añez Chavez, Maria Elena Mendez de Leon, Mollina Roger Pinto, Carlos Sonnenschein Antelo, Marcelo Antezana and Bernard O. Sanz Gutierrez, who in the coming days will assume his post as head of the opposition bloc.

(Text from press release used with permission.)

Operation Venezuela

Operation Venezuela took place January 23, Sunday 10 AM, on the anniversary of the deposing of a dictator in Venezuela 1958. The main rally was in Caracas. There were support rallies against dictatorship in Venezuela on 4 continents. The events can be followed in the archived “live blog” below. There are both updates written in our “newsroom” and direct tweets from the ground in Venezuela.

From the gathering in Caracas. The crowd continued around the corner of the boulevard in the top left corner. I estimate over 100,000 people. The state TV channel reported 646 persons.

Map of Caracas

To help with orientation this map was created in Google Maps. Miraflores is the presidential palace. The main gathering is at 10:00 at Chacaíto metro station and east of it. At 12:00 there will be speeches at Plaza Venezuela, just west of the metro station by that name. At 08:30 organizers in Caracas will meet the caravan that has traveled for a week from western Venezuela, at the La Bandera metro station, and from there move to Plaza Venezuela.

Updated map over Caracas with relevant information. Miraflores is the presidential palace. Chavistas are meeting at Plaza O'Leary and marching to Miraflores. The opposition is meeting at Centro Comercial Lido. The metropolitan police is positioned between the two. SEBIN is the political police, where many political prisoners are held. The airport is in the east. Click to see in full scale.

Blog page created 2011-01-21 12:15, last updated 2011-01-23 19:37 ET.

Flyers for Jan 23 rally

The flyers just arrived from “Sebastián Francisco de Miranda Rodríguez”, an alias using the name of the man who led the liberation fight of Venezuela against Spain. The main event is of course the one in Caracas, on the anniversary of the overthrowing of the last dictator. There will be no speeches or marches, just a mass gathering in Caracas, between Chacaito station and Parque del Este, along Avenida Fransisco de Miranda. This is about 6 km due east of the presidential palace, Miraflores. A list of confirmed venues follows the posters!

English flyer
Click on image to open in full resolution (1530x1980)
Flyer en español
Haga clic para abrirlo en alta resolución (1530x1980)

The following flyer outlines the nature of the dictatorship in Venezuela.

Infografia
Haga clic para abrirlo en alta resolución

List of confirmed venues
Times in 24 hour format, local time zone.

VENEZUELA
CARACAS
LUGAR: Avenida Fransisco de Miranda, Chacaíto
HORA: 10:00

Supporting rallies around the world, by continent and country:

NORTH AMERICA

USA

BOSTON
PLACE: Copley Square, entre las calles Boylston y Dartmouth, Boston
TIME: 11:00

CHARLOTTE
PLACE: 600 S Tryon St, Charlotte, NC (in front of Charlotte Observer)
TIME: 14:00

DALLAS
PLACE: La Carreta Argentina 214-944-5300. 1115 N. Beckley Ave, Dallas, TX
TIME: 14:00

HOUSTON
PLACE: In front of La Informacion newspaper, at 6065 Hillcroft St, Houston, TX 77081
TIME: 10:00

LOS ANGELES
PLACE: Federal Building at 1100 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90024
TIME: 13:00

MIAMI
PLACE: El Arepazo 2 3900 NW 79th Ave. Doral, FL
TIME: 12:30

NEW YORK
PLACE: 6th Avenue and 59th Street, NY, NY, monument of Simon Bolivar and José Martí (south of Central Park; authorized by NYPD)
TIME: 12:00

SAN FRANCISCO
PLACE: Union Square, downtown San Francisco, CA
TIME: 12:00

WASHINGTON DC
PLACE: Triangle Park (Simon Bolivar Statue Park), Intersection between Virginia Avenue N.W. and 18th st N.W.
TIME: 14:00

CANADA

EDMONTON
PLACE: Corner of White Ave (82nd) and Gateway Blvd (103rd)
TIME: 13:00

TORONTO
PLACE: Speakers Corner (between Nathan Phillips Square and Osgood Hall, Downtown)
TIME: 13:00

LATIN AMERICA

ARGENTINA

BUENOS AIRES
LUGAR: Monumento de los Españoles
HORA: 13:30

BRAZIL

SAN PAULO
LUGAR: Monumento As Bandeiras, Sao Paulo (al frente del Parque Ibirapuera) Praça Armando Salles de Oliveira S/N, São Paulo
HORA: 12:00

CHILE

SANTIAGO
LUGAR: Av. Dag Hammarskjold 3177, Vitacura, Santiago
HORA: TBA

COLOMBIA

BOGOTA
LUGAR: Parque nacional, calle 39 con carrera 7ma, costado occidental, Bogotá
HORA: 11:30

ECUADOR

GUAYAQUIL
LUGAR: Av 9 de octubre y Pedro Carbo, Plaza de San Francisco, Guayaquil
HORA: 16:30

HONDURAS

TEGUCIGALPA
LUGAR: Paseo Los Próceres, Tegucigalpa
HORA: 15:00

MEXICO

MEXICO DF
LUGAR: Obelisco a Bolivar en frente al Hard Rock Cafe
HORA: 12:00

NICARAGUA

MANAGUA
LUGAR: Permiso negado “por seguridad”*
HORA: –

PANAMA

PANAMA
LUGAR: Cinta Costera en las escalinatas frente a la estatua de Balboa, Panama
HORA: 10:00

PUERTO RICO

SAN JUAN
LUGAR: Parque Munhoz rivera, frente a la estatua de “El Libertador”
HORA: 10:30

PERU

LIMA
LUGAR: Plaza San Martin
HORA: 16:00

EUROPE

AUSTRIA

VIENNA
PLACE: Die Pestsäule Am Graben, 1010 Wien
TIME: 14:30

FRANCE

PARIS
PLACE: Trocadéro
TIME: TBA

GERMANY

FRANKFURT
PLACE: In front of “Alte Oper” (Teatro de la Opera), Am Opern Platz, 60313 Frankfurt am Main
TIME: 12:00

ITALY

BOLOGNA
PLACE: Piazza Maggiore
TIME: 15:00

MILANO
PLACE: Piazza del Duomo de Milan
TIME: 14:00

TURIN
PLACE: Delante del Tempio valdese (Torino (TO), Corso Vittorio Emanuele II, 23
TIME: 11:45

NETHERLANDS

AMSTERDAM
PLACE: Plaza del Dam, Amsterdam
TIME: 13:00

SPAIN

BARCELONA
LUGAR: Plaza de la Catedral, 08002 Barcelona
HORA: 12:00

MADRID
LUGAR: Paseo Venezuela del Parque El Retiro de Madrid
HORA: 12:00

AUSTRALIA

PERTH
PLACE: Corner of Williams St and Hays St, Perth
TIME: 12:00

First published 2011-01-16 18:03, last updated 2011-01-21 20:30 ET.

*One can only speculate that Daniel Ortega fears that his regime would be in risk of being overthrown if he would allow this demonstration. What else could the alleged “security risk” be?

Ten tenets of Chavizm

Leaked US diplomatic cable, reproduced in its entirety. This was written June 16, 2009, 12 days before the first major setback of Chavizm: The deposing of his Quisling in Honduras, Manuel Zelaya.

A student of history may find that most of these tenets are not new by any means. They have been used in the past over and over by other dictators, e.g., Adolf Hitler. The repression has continued after this cable was written, by making judge Maria Afiuni and former presidential candidate Alejandro Peña Esclusa the latest political prisoners. How much longer, Venezuela?


VZCZCXRO0130
PP RUEHAO RUEHCD RUEHGA RUEHGD RUEHHA RUEHHO RUEHMC RUEHMT RUEHNG
RUEHNL RUEHQU RUEHRD RUEHRG RUEHRS RUEHTM RUEHVC
DE RUEHCV #0750/01 1671323
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 161323Z JUN 09 ZDK
FM AMEMBASSY CARACAS
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 3212
INFO RUEHWH/WESTERN HEMISPHERIC AFFAIRS DIPL POSTS PRIORITY
RUMIAAA/HQ USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY


C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 04 CARACAS 000750

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT PASS TO AID/OTI (RPORTER)
HQSOUTHCOM ALSO FOR POLAD

E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/11/2019
TAGS: PGOV PREL KDEM VE
SUBJECT: TEN TENETS OF CHAVISMO

Classified By: CHARGE d'AFFAIRES JOHN P. CAULFIELD, REASONS 1.4 (B) AND
(D)

1. This message is the end of tour analysis of the political
situation in Venezuela by Embassy Deputy Political Counselor
Dan Lawton.

2. (C) Summary. Despite President Chavez's professed
allegiance to socialism, his political project lacks any
consistent ideology. Instead, the Venezuelan president
exercises an increasingly authoritarian playbook that ensures
his unquestioned, indefinite leadership and concentrates more
and more power in his hands. The Government of the
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (GBRV) aggressively defends
its democratic legitimacy at the same time that it targets
key opposition leaders, polarizes society along political and
class lines, and hypes the existence of external and internal
enemies to justify repressive measures. Chavez's preference
for loyalty over competence, creation of parallel Bolivarian
institutions, efforts to forge a one-party state, and
chest-thumping nationalism also smack of creeping
totalitarianism. Overall, Chavismo poses a serious threat to
democracy not just in Venezuela but throughout the region,
and it directly competes against U.S. influence in Latin
America. Moreover, it is becoming ever more difficult to
begin any dialogue with a GBRV increasingly consumed by its
own solipsistic "revolutionary" fervor and outsized ambition.
End Summary.

--------------------------------------------- ------
One - There Is Only One Great, Indispensable Leader
--------------------------------------------- ------

3. (C) President Chavez has carefully cultivated his own
personality cult, such that for most Venezuelan voters,
President Chavez embodies Chavismo. Outsized billboards and
posters of Chavez dominate public buildings as well as the
rallies and campaigns of his United Socialist Party of
Venezuela (PSUV). Venezuelans can buy a wide range of Chavez
paraphernalia from Chavez action figures to Chavez watches to
a compact disc of Chavez singing Venezuelan folk songs. He
dominates all state media, which also broadcast his Sunday
"Alo, Presidente" talk show. Chavez regularly requires all
local television and radio networks to carry his speeches
("cadenas"); he has wracked up over 1200 such hours (50 days)
on the air. He has not groomed any successor and he
frequently rebukes even his most trusted advisors publicly.

4. (C) In pursuing the elimination of presidential term
limits, Chavez declared publicly numerous times that he is
indispensable to his Bolivarian Revolution. While voters
rejected his constitutional reform package in December 2007,
he succeeded in winning public approval of the elimination of
term limits for all elected offices in the February 2009
referendum. Chavez has repeatedly stated that he plans to
govern at least until 2020. A corollary to the Venezuelan
president's protagonism is that there can be no Chavismo
without Chavez. No Chavez supporter who has broken with
Chavez has prospered politically. The formerly pro-Chavez
Podemos party is all but broken after opposing Chavez's 2007
constitutional reform package. Former Defense Minister Raul
Baduel also spoke against indefinite reelection; he is
currently sitting in a Caracas military prison awaiting trial
on corruption charges.

----------------------
Two - Centralize Power
----------------------

5. (C) Chavez's "Socialism of the 21st Century" exalts the
government's active role in the economy and vilifies
capitalism, but in the minds of most Venezuelans, it remains
a vague notion of a state bearing benefits. The thread that
most consistently ties together Chavez's political project is
the increasing concentration of power in his hands. Chavez
has firm control over all the other branches of government.
The opposition foolishly boycotted National Assembly
elections in 2005, and currently only approximately 15 former
government supporters do not automatically support Chavez in
the 167-seat unicameral legislature. With few exceptions,
the judiciary rules in favor of the executive branch, even in
civil cases bereft of political implications.

6. (C) Chavez is also squeezing state and local governments
from above and below. He recently promulgated a law that
allows the central government to take state control over
ports, airports, and highways. The central government has
done just that in states run by opposition governors.

Moreover, Chavez created an appointed position to take over
virtually all the functions and budget of the opposition
mayor of Caracas. The National Assembly is considering
creating presidentially appointed regional vice presidencies
that would undermine elected governors. The Venezuelan
president also created community councils nationwide which
are registered by and report directly to the Office of the
Presidency. Chavez diverted 30 percent of state and local
discretionary development funds to these community councils.

--------------------------------------------
Three - Hype External and Internal "Enemies"
--------------------------------------------

7. (C) Chavez insists on depicting the United States (which
he habitually refers to as "The Empire") as Venezuela's
enemy. Although most Venezuelans are not anti-American,
Chavez's radical foreign policy plays to his base of firm
supporters and serves as a convenient rallying cry during
Venezuela's frequent elections. Although he holds virtually
absolute power in Venezuela, Chavez tries to reframe public
perceptions by depicting himself as David fighting Goliath,
usually the United States, but also occasionally Spain,
Colombia, or Israel. Chavez and other senior GBRV leaders
have tempered this script somewhat since the election of
President Obama. They tend to praise the President and
Secretary personally, while quickly adding that "imperial"
political power continues to be exercised in the United
States by big business, the military establishment, and the
CIA.

8. (C) Although domestic opposition to Chavez is weak and
disunited, Chavez and senior GBRV officials regularly accuse
it of plotting to overthrow or assassinate the Venezuelan
president in coordination with the United States. The GBRV
does not produce proof or in most cases actually pursue
charges; such allegations conveniently serve to circle the
wagons within Chavismo, to prevent across-the-aisle political
dialogue, and to discredit the opposition. The GBRV
regularly reminds voters that large sectors of the opposition
participated in the short-lived 2002 coup to give greater
credence to current "threats." Chavez also accuses the
opposition of doing the USG's bidding, calling them
"pitiyanquis." Moreover, government supporters regularly
accuse opposition-oriented press outlets of "media
terrorism," essentially building the case for continued
government harassment of the vestiges of independent media.

---------------
Four - Polarize
---------------

9. (C) Railing against the "oligarchs," Chavez exploits class
divisions in stratified Venezuela for political gain. By
playing almost exclusively to the over 70% of Venezuelans who
are poor, Chavez has maintained a reliable electoral majority
(with the exception of the 2007 constitutional referendum
vote when many Chavistas abstained). He is not only
channeling government resources to the economically
disadvantaged, but also prioritizing the GBRV's role in the
economy at the expense of the private sector. Such policies
squeeze the middle class and are feeding a growing brain
drain of professionals, sectors of society traditionally
associated with the opposition. They also increase citizens'
economic dependence on the GBRV.

10. (C) Politically, Chavez tolerates no middle ground.
Although increasingly large numbers of voters consider
themselves politically neutral, most Venezuelans still
habitually self-identify themselves as either with "the
process" or against. Moreover, the GBRV has a good idea
where most voters stand. Those that signed the 2004 recall
referendum soon found themselves on the infamous "Tascon
List" by which the GBRV discriminated in terms of government
jobs, contracts, and other benefits. In his speeches, Chavez
frequently cites mentor Fidel Castro, bellowing in stark
terms, "With the revolution, everything; outside, nothing."
After its most recent registration drive, the PSUV claims
over seven million members. Local analysts believe the PSUV
party list is becoming the "reverse Tascon List" -- if your
name is not on it, you cannot expect to get government
services (at least not without paying intermediaries).

---------------------------------------
Five - Insist on Democratic Credentials
---------------------------------------

11. (C) Senior GBRV leaders insist that "participatory"

democracy is superior to "representative" democracy. They
contend that real democracies give priority to "social
rights" and argue that concepts such as checks and balances
and institutional autonomy are discredited "bourgeois"
concepts. Chavez also regularly stresses that he has held
national elections almost yearly since he was first elected
in 1998, blurring any distinction between being elected
democratically and governing democratically. Anxious to
preserve their democratic legitimacy at home and abroad,
Chavez and senior GBRV officials lash out immediately and
disproportionately to any criticism of GBRV abuses. They
traditionally dismiss any criticism as interference in
Venezuela's domestic affairs and insult or try to discredit
any government or organization that faults the GBRV (without
ever engaging on the substance of the critique). The GBRV
forcibly expelled a Human Rights Watch leader and a member of
the European Parliament when they publicly took issue with
the GBRV's human rights record while in Caracas.

------------------------------------
Six - Reward Loyalty Over Competence
------------------------------------

12. (C) The single most important common characteristic of
Chavez's ministers and other senior officials is their
unquestioning loyalty to the Venezuelan president. He tends
to rotate a small coterie of firm supporters through senior
positions, simultaneously rewarding his inner circle while
preventing them from accruing either real expertise or an
independent power base. A substantial portion of Chavez's
appointed officials participated in his failed 1992 military
coup. Moreover, Chavez retains loyalists despite their poor
administrative or electoral track records. He named
Diosadado Cabello, who last year lost his re-election for the
Miranda Governorship, to be Minister of Infrastructure and
Telecommunications. Chavez appointed Jessie Chacon
Information Minister after he lost the mayoral race in the
Sucre borough of Caracas. By contrast, Chavez's PSUV
temporarily expelled Henri Falcon, the then widely hailed
competent mayor of Barquisimeto, only to quickly reinstate
him after it became obvious that Falcon would win the
governorship of Lara State in 2008 with or without the PSUV's
endorsement.

---------------------------
Seven - Repress Selectively
---------------------------

13. (C) The GBRV picks its political victims carefully,
making examples of sector leaders. Such calibrated
repression has so far avoided any significant public backlash
while at the same time created a climate of fear in civil
society and fostered self-censorship in the media. Examples
abound. The GBRV recently pressed corruption charges against
Maracaibo Mayor and 2006 consensus opposition presidential
candidate Manuel Rosales; Rosales fled to Peru where he was
granted asylum. The GBRV jailed Carlos Ortega, the leader of
the largest opposition trade union confederation. He escaped
from military prison in 2006 and was also granted asylum in
Peru. The GBRV closed the only critical free-to-air
television network in 2007 and is threatening to do the same
to opposition-oriented cable news network Globovision.
Prominent electoral NGO Sumate has been subject to numerous
government investigations. Chavez and other senior GBRV
officials have blasted prominent Catholic Church officials
for defending democracy, and pro-Chavez thugs briefly
occupied the Cardinal's residence in downtown Caracas.

----------------------------------
Eight - Create Parallel Structures
----------------------------------

14. (C) Over the last ten years, the GBRV and its supporters
and allies have created new bodies and institutions in an
effort to undermine and outflank organizations that it could
neither control nor co-opt. Domestically, the GBRV and its
adherents have spawned pro-government NGOs, business groups,
labor unions, television and radio networks, and even a
socialist spin-off of the Catholic Church. Chavez's social
programs ("misiones") generally sidestep and starve long
established government ministries of resources.
Internationally, Chavez is endeavoring to establish
multilateral organizations that both magnify Venezuela's
influence and combat purported "U.S. imperialism." From the
GBRV's perspective, ALBA, Petrocaribe, UNASUR, and the Bank
of the South are tools with which to supplant or weaken the
OAS, IMF, and the World Bank.

-------------------------
Nine - Party Equals State
-------------------------

15. (C) Since creating the United Socialist Party of
Venezuela (PSUV) in 2007, President Chavez has been trying to
forge a one-party state. Chavez uses government resources,
especially state media, and pressures the over two million
government employees to support the Venezuelan president,
PSUV candidates, and his referendum proposals during
elections. The National Electoral Council (CNE) staffs PSUV
registration drives. Chavez demanded that all pro-government
parties join the PSUV, but three parties, the Communist Party
(PCV), Patria Para Todos (PPT), and the Podemos party,
declined. Podemos later joined the opposition in 2007. The
PSUV declined to support any PPT or PCV gubernatorial and
mayoral candidates in the 2008 state and local elections and
neither party now exercises any meaningful local power.
Moreover, the National Assembly is seriously considering an
electoral law that would almost certainly expand the PSUV's
absolute legislative majority and diminish the influence of
the PPT and PCV after the 2010 parliamentary elections.

----------------------------
Ten - Monopolize Nationalism
----------------------------

16. (C) Calling himself the heir to Venezuelan founder Simon
Bolivar, Chavez asserts exclusive claim to Venezuela's
forefathers and national symbols. He regularly cites Bolivar
and other national heroes out of context, insisting that they
were early socialists. One of Chavez's stock stump speech
messages is that his Bolivarian Revolution liberated
Venezuela from being an American colony and will make
Venezuela a world power in coming decades. In contrast,
Chavez and his supporters depict the opposition as
unpatriotic, stateless, or paid U.S. agents. Chavez's own
exaggerated demonstrations of patriotism conveniently
distract public attention from local problems or demonstrate
incontrovertibly that he can do what he wants. In 2006,
Chavez added a star to the Venezuelan flag and flipped the
horse on the national seal to make it run left, not right.
In 2007, he eliminated three zeros from the currency and
changed its name from "bolivars" to "strong bolivars." He
also added the prefix "People's Power" to all ministries and
ordered all Venezuelan clocks changed by thirty minutes to
create a unique Venezuelan time zone. In 2008, he suggested
that he would exhume Bolivar's body to prove that he was
poisoned (He has not done so yet).

-------
Comment
-------

17. (C) The increasingly authoritarian nature of Chavismo,
not to mention its habitual and politically convenient
vilification of the United States, pose considerable
challenges to any effort to improve bilateral ties. Chavez
and other senior GBRV officials publicly express interest in
greater dialogue with the USG, but the reality is that to
date, the GBRV has been reluctant to create meaningful and
easily accessible channels of communication, let alone engage
substantively on issues that should be of common interest.
The GBRV also makes it clear that it will not accept or look
past any USG criticism, however well-founded or required by
congressionally-mandated reports or testimony. Facing no
checks on his power at home, Chavez craves international
attention and influence abroad. Whether it is funneling arms
and money to the FARC, sending suitcases of money to the
Kirchner campaign in Argentina, or exporting elements of
Chavismo to ALBA countries, to name just a few prominent
examples, Chavez's outsized ambition backed by petrodollars
makes Venezuela an active and intractable U.S. competitor in
the region.

It was 20 years ago today

It was 20 years ago today that the Soviet tanks ran over and killed 14 civilians when taking the TV-tower in Vilnius, Lithuania. In the second largest city of the country, Kaunas, Liucija Baskauskas was sitting in their TV-tower watching live feeds. She cabled out the news to every address in her address book, and thus made the world aware of the violent crackdown. This, and her subsequent outspoken fearlessness on Lithuanian TV in the face of the Soviet threat, made her a national hero of the singing revolution, and it may well have contributed significantly to the success of the liberation of not just Lithuania but also of Latvia and Estonia.

Vilnius January 16, 1991
14 defenders of liberty were crushed to death as the Soviet tanks advanced.

These people were unarmed civilians. Just like the ones who deposed the dictator of Tunisia two days ago. There is no doubt that many, many more lives would have been lost if they had chosen an armed struggle. What the Baltic peoples demonstrated to the world, was that even in the face of a cynical dictatorship an unarmed united people cannot be defeated.

The background to the event was that Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia had declared themselves independent from the Soviet Union. Their countries were still occupied by Soviet forces, so the people stood guard around all important buildings 24/7, including this biting cold night 20 years ago. They came from all over the country, a friend of mine said she had a feeling something would happen and took the train from Kaunas to Vilnius after work, to stand guard rather than sleep.

In the following months Liucija Baskauskas told her audience, every day, not to let themselves be intimidated into silence but to keep talking about what they had seen that night. In fact, she asked them to write down their eyewitness accounts and to send them to the TV show. They got over 3,000 accounts of what had happened that faithful night. The stories were typed in a computer database, and the letters destroyed to avoid that they fell in the hands of KGB.

The database was smuggled out to Sweden, in a KGB vehicle, and that’s where I met them. Finally the hard disk of the computer was destroyed to eliminate the risk that it was decoded by KGB. This happened a couple of weeks before the coup d’État in Moscow, an expected event. Luckily something unexpected happened, and that was when Boris Yeltsin (perhaps after having too much vodka?) climbed up on that tank and gave a speech which changed the course of history, making him president of Russia.

May God bless all those who gave their life for freedom that night. They changed the course of history for the better, for all of us.

Tuve un sueño anoche

Era el doce cumpleaños de una niña. Su madre estaba allí, pero la niña no se encontraba. La gente sabía que había desaparecido, pero no sabía como decirlo a la madre. En la casa tenían un cuadro de la familia. Lo enseñaban a la madre, sin embargo la cara de la niña era cubierto de otra pintura o tela. Pusieron una foto del rostro de la niña en el lugar, pero la madre lo sacó para ver la pintura, y la cara de la niña todavía no estaba. Era el doce cumpleaños de la niña.

La fecha del sueño ese fue hoy, el 15 de enero de 2011. Al despertar, me recordé otro sueño, que tuve el 11 de marzo de 1995: Una mujer desapareció frente a mis ojos, volvió invisible. Un voz decía a la mujer a mi lado que tiene que cambiar el mundo dentro de 12 horas, o nunca más en su vida se iba a disfrutar de la presencia de la mujer vuelta invisible.

Queda obvio que los dos sueños se tratan de la misma tema. Doce horas, doce años, lo importante es el número doce, no la unidad. ¿Pero quien es la mujer que desaparece?

Ayer escuché la noticia que Chepe Fortuna había sido prohibido en Venezuela, ya que en esa novela colombiana un perrito se llama Huguito y la dueña del perro, Venezuela. Allá está la interpretación, que el país sea representada por una mujer, como en el Statue of Liberty.

La mujer que volvió invisible, la niña que desapareció y cuya cara fue cubierto en el cuadro, era la Venezuela libre, la Venezuela democrática.

El número doce se refiere a los doce años en poder de Hugo Chávez. Ya sabemos que no tiene ninguna intención de dejar el poder no importa los comicios en 2012. Para detener la dictadura el pueblo tiene que actuar ahora, antes que se ha consolidado por completo. Chávez fue inaugurado como presidente el 2 de febrero, 1999. Falta 15 días para cumplir 12 años.

Curiosidades: Hugo Chávez fue liberado el 27 de marzo de 1994 después del fracasado golpe militar en 1992. Poco después del sueño en 1995 el avión en lo cual viajé aterrizó brevemente en Caracas. Es lo único que he visto de ese país.

January 23 the Day to Stop Chávez

On January 23, 1958, the people of Venezuela threw out the dictator. January 23, 2011, they again take to the streets against a dictator. This time his name is Hugo Rafael Chávez Frías.

Graffiti on statue
The graffiti reads, "We'll meet the 23rd" (uploaded Jan 7, 2011).

The protest will be carried out from 10 AM to noon in Caracas as well as in cities all over the country. Supporting demonstrations will be held the same day in Paris, New York, Boston, Miami, Madrid, Lima, Washington, Buenos Aires, Managua, Guatemala City, Tegucigalpa, Panama, Rome, Bologna, Los Angeles, Vienna, London, Sao Paolo, Guayaquil, Asuncion, Santiago, and Sydney.

The protest is organized by a large number of organizations in cooperation. The theme is “Detengamos la dictadura en Venezuela”. There will be no speeches or marches, just a mass gathering in Caracas, between Chacaito station and Parque del Este, along Avenida Fransisco de Miranda. This is about 6 km due east of the presidential palace, Miraflores.

Background, in Spanish: Declaration by laywers, declaration by the Catholic church in Venezuela, letter from the opposition to the Organization for American States (OAS).

Det kalla kriget tog inte slut

Det kalla kriget tog inte slut med kommunismens fall i Europa. Det gjorde bara en strategisk reträtt, medan den trotskistiska bolshevismen övervintrade på Kuba. Utan att ha uppmärksammats i västvärlden har nu kommunismen ryckt fram på bred front. Om den inte stoppas kommer det snart att utgöra ett reellt hot mot både USA och Europa. I Latinamerika är den redan etablerad.

Venezuelas folkvalde president Hugo Chávez har utnyttjat demokratin för att komma till makten. Väl där har han nu monterat ner hela det demokratiska systemet och ersatt det med en kommunistisk diktatur. Detta efter att han förlorat parlamentsvalen i september. Förlorat och förlorat, hans grupp fick 48% av rösterna men 60% av mandaten. Tillräckligt lite för att få honom att släppa den demokratiska fasaden och klart styra åt det diktatoriska håll som hans belackare i 11 år har varnat för var hans verkliga mål.

Ända sedan Chávez misslyckade statskupp 1992 mot den socialdemokratiska presidenten Carlos Andrés Perez (han dog på juldagen i fjol) har hans maktambitioner varit kända, men ändå lyckades han bli vald till president 1998.

Efter valförlusten den 26 september 2010 såg Chávez till att den utgående kongressen gav honom rätt att styra med dekret, samtidigt som den förbjöd riksdagsmännen att rösta efter sitt samvete. De ersatte vidare alla regionala och lokala valda församlingar med toppstyrda “kommuner” enligt sovjet-modell, och skapade 10 militärstyrda områden i landet. Plus ungefär 20 ytterligare lagar som alla i varierande grad undergräver demokrati, yttrandefrihet och rättsstat.

Chávez idol är Fidel Castro. I presidentpalatset, Miraflores, finns en ledningscentral, ett “war room” för propaganda, som är bemannat med kubaner under direkt befäl av Kubas vicepresident kommandant Valdes, enligt uppgifter från den demokratiska motståndsrörelsen i Venezuela. Valdes tillhör det gamla gardet; han slogs med Fidel och Raúl Castro i Sierra Madre. Deras mantra är permanent revolution. Men vad är då trotskistisk bolshevism?

Bolshevism är den form av kommunism som menar att ändamålen helgar medlen – precis som Chávez och hans kubanska “rådgivare”. I revolutionens namn är det inte ett brott att konfiskera egendom från revolutionens fiender. I fjol hungerstrejkade en bonde sig till döds för att få tillbaka sin gård. Det är klasskamp av klassiskt slag som gäller i Venezuela år 2011.

Trotskij menade, till skillnad från Stalin, att revolutionen först skulle spridas till andra länder, innan den konsoliderades i det egna landet. Just detta har Chávez och hans kubanska “rådgivare” gjort i åratal. Venezuelas oljemiljoner har använts dels till att hålla Kuba flytande (efter att Sovjet kollapsade blev ju Kuba utan sitt understöd, så där kom Chávez valseger i Venezuela väl till pass), dels till att sprida revolutionen till Ecuador, Bolivia, Honduras, och att få gamle revolutionären och diktatorn Ortega vald i Nicaragua.

I samtliga fall är processen likartad. Hjälp en presidentkandidat ekonomiskt med valkampanjen. Typ Manuel Zelaya i Honduras, han fick 50 miljoner. När han blivit vald erbjuds han att köpa olja med 50% på kredit. De femtio procenten ges dock inte som lån till landet, utan till presidenten, eller snarare presidentämbetet. Han kan använda de pengarna totalt utanför budgeten. Naturligtvis vore det landsförräderi och mutbrott i Sverige, men i Latinamerika är det inte så strikt med lagar och sånt. I gengäld måste presidenten göra en sak för Castro genom Chávez: Hålla en konstituerande grundlagsförsamling.

Orsaken till att det skall vara en konstituerande grundlagsförsamling och inte en redigering på laglig väg i kongressen är ganska säkert att det blir lättare att sätta in pålitliga personer i processen, och skapa ett dokument som är till uppdragsgivarens belåtenhet.

I Honduras förstod folk vartåt det lutade och stoppade Zelaya i tid (trots att den amerikanske ambassadören av allt att döma intrigerade för att hjälpa Zelaya, Chávez, och därmed Castro). Han avsattes, och demokratin räddades. Åtminstone tills vidare, för det utövas starka påtryckningar på den nye folkvalde presidenten att sätta sig över domstolsväsendet och starta en process som i förlängningen leder till den där konstituerade grundlagsförsamlingen. Bland de länder som utövar dessa påtryckningar finns naturligtvis Kuba och Venezuela, samt de andra köpta länderna (Nicaragua, Ecuador, Bolivia), men också märkligt nog USA.

Varför USA tar denna sida i konflikten kan jag bara gissa. Att ambassadören i Honduras spelar under täcket är en möjlighet. Att det är i USAs intresse är en annan, men i så fall offrar man cyniskt Honduras demokrati för att få tillgång till Venezuelas olja (10% av USAs oljeförbrukning härrör från Venezuela), och kanske för att hindra en öppen konflikt med Chávez som skulle kunna leda till att kommunismen sprids till ännu fler länder i Latinamerika. Det är i så fall ett vanskligt spel. Varför spela så högt?

Anledningen vore säkerligen att USA inte längre är berett att spela “bad cop”, med Europa som “good cop”. Priset för det kan ses som för högt för Obama. Han kan ha valt en taktik att ligga lågt tills Europa tar sitt ansvar.

Det ironiska är att EU länge uttryckt önskemål om att spela en viktigare roll i världspolitiken. Men nu, när deras röst verkligen behövs, så hörs bara tystnad.

Var finns fördömandet av att Hugo Chávez gjort sig till envåldshärskare?

Var finns det moraliska stödet till de demokratiska krafterna i Venezuela?

Var finns insikten att Chávez och Castro är allierade med Iran, Vitryssland, Ryssland, Syrien, och att dessa håller på att bygga upp ett världsomspännande imperium av diktaturer med kopplingar till knarksmuggling och terrorism?

Om EU kan uttala ett klart stöd, så ökar det väsentligt sannolikheten för att demokratin vinner. Det finns nämligen en opposition även inom den styrande gruppen, riktad mot att landets rikedomar går utomlands medan de egna innevånarna får det allt sämre (bortsett då från regimens stödtrupper så att säga.) Det finns också ett starkt motstånd inom militären mot den påtvingade utländska kontrollen och de kommunistiska idealen. Men framför allt finns det en organiserad motståndsrörelse under kommandant Panela, som kämpar för att avsätta Hugo Chávez med alla till buds stående fredliga medel.

Motståndsrörelsens mål är alltså att med icke-våldsmetoder tvinga ut Chávez och kubanerna från Miraflores. Målet är att återinföra demokratin och respekten för grundlagen. För tydlighets skull vill jag säga, att eftersom regimen uttryckligen anser att deras “revolution” är viktigare än motståndarnas mänskliga rättigheter, så finns det en uppenbar risk för att de helt enkelt slår ner den demokratiska motståndsrörelsen med militärt övervåld. Därför förbehåller sig motståndsrörelsen rätten att försvara sig om de blir anfallna. Deras uttalade förhoppning är dock att militären helt enkelt skall förhålla sig passiv.

Via mellanhänder har jag varit i kontakt med kommandant Panela, och kan vidarebefordra en begäran att Sverige och de övriga EU-länderna klart fördömer införandet av diktatur i Venezuela, och uppmuntrar till en fredlig återgång till demokrati i enlighet med grundlagen – vilken i sin sista paragraf faktiskt säger att det är alla medborgares skyldighet att återetablera respekten för grundlagen om den bryts.

Då Honduras slog tillbaka det kommunistiska anfallet 2009 var det en liten delseger. Om Venezuela kan göra samma sak nu så vore det en oändligt mycket större seger för demokratin, för det är Venezuela som är den ekonomiska drivkraften i alla kommunistiska projekt i Latinamerika för närvarande. Även Kuba kan stå på fallrepet snart om Venezuelas diktatur faller. Detta skulle vara en enorm vinst för världens säkerhet och framtida fred. Så hjälp till att sprida informationen är du snäll!